[The Transit Advocate]
Public Transit Policy, Analysis, Advocacy and Education
Newsletter of the Southern California Transit Advocates
Vol 14, No.6, June 2006

Copyright 2006 Southern California Transit Advocates. Permission is freely granted to reproduce or reprint ORIGINAL articles, provided credit is given to both the author and the Southern California Transit Advocates. In all other cases, permission must be secured with the copyright holder.

Disclaimer: The Southern California Transit Advocates is not affiliated with any governmental agency or transportation provider. Names and logos of agencies appear for information and reference purposes only. 


Public and Legislative Affairs ReportDana Gabbard
I am still reflecting on the Feb. 11 appearance of former Massachusetts Governor Michael Dukakis before the largest gathering to ever attend one of our events--nearly 40 people! It was a surprisingly lively presentation he gave; his obvious passion on urban issues explains his teaching classes in public policy at UCLA while wintering in L.A. And I was glad to see shortly thereafter CityBeat did an interview with him that captured his passion and intelligence. Such a shame we have few of this caliber in public life these days.

The April 14 issue of Garment & Citizen had an article titled “Bus Riders Union Says Talk of Fare Increase Points to Need for Extension of Federal Consent Decree”. This compelled me to write a letter published in the May 6 issue ("Bashing the BRU") which pointed out "Provisions of the federal consent decree [that governs aspects of the MTA’s operations] relating to fares expired January 1, 2004. Extending the consent decree has zero to do with any potential MTA fare increase. The Bus Riders Union (BRU) knows this, but shows their true colors by being more interested in generating publicity with misleading sound bites than being honest. That isn’t surprising, since it has been the BRU’s modus operandi since day one."

In a similar vein the Daily News ("Union asking judge to extend MTA decree", May 25) quoted a BRU statement on their request for a five year extension of the consent decree that MTA's current budget woes "... sets up the conditions for MTA to claim the only way to balance the budget in the future is to make bus riders pay with service cuts and fare increases". Interestingly the Daily News reports after Special master Donald Bliss resigned that Judge Hatter declined to appoint a replacement. What this may mean regarding a possible extension is hard to conjecture. Hatter took senior status in April of 2005, and is now overseeing a dwindling docket of cases from his existing calendar.

Recently I undertook a pilgrimage to Skylight Books, on Vermont just south of Franklin. Some years ago I read they stocked a history of the Los Feliz Improvement Association, one of the oldest neighborhood organizations in Los Angeles founded in 1916. This piqued my interest because Scott Bottles in his book Los Angeles and the Automobile : The Making of the Modern City quotes a letter the Association sent the city regarding traffic issues in the 1920s. Similarly William Fulton in his book The Reluctant Metropolis: The Politics of Urban Growth in Los Angeles notes how much our region has been shaped by groups like LFIA. The book (mostly compiled from records stored for decades in--I am not making this up--two barrels) gives a fascinating picture of L.A. growing and coping with its growth. Transportation and development issues reappear across the decades in its 50 some pages.

Michael Turner of MTA Government Relations made a splendid presentation at the May 24 MTA Citizens' Advisory Council meeting on the infrastructure bond that will be on the November ballot. I have made copies of a sheet he distributed which we will share a our next meeting that outlines the various categories the transportation bond would fund. Turner also shared a U.S. Dept of Transportation graphic on growth in ports which makes clear that the L.A./Long Beach complex dwarfs anything else in the U.S. and faces daunting growth challenges in the next 14 years.

Keeping in mind community support has proven crucial to the funding of projects like Expo, I will note the latest grassroots light rail proposal is one for San Pedro promoted by a group calling itself “Citizens for a Harbor Line”. It was noted on our member board they don't seem to have a lot of detail as to routes, etc. In any case you can look at their so far threadbare website at http://harborline.blogspot.com/

May 23 I attended a meeting on the Exposition light rail project at Los Angeles Trade Tech, along with Charles Hobbs and Kent Landfield. At one point a vocal activist pointedly stated the neighborhoods along the route were opposed to any property being taken. Later she inquired why more parking hadn't been provided at stations along the route. To which I thought "because otherwise they'd have to seize property, which you just told us you oppose". Talk about a contradiction!

Once in a while, while reading some dreary document I'll suddenly strike gold. This happened recently while slogging through the Metrolink proposed 2006-2007 budget. Buried in it was a line item to repair vandalized ticket machines. It seems in May 2005 a series of machines were robbed by thieves using a hydraulic jack to pop the door open. Six machines had damage so extensive they had to be scrapped. One solution being implemented is to harden the doors. I know a recent break-in was caught on camera, but I don't recall these earlier thefts getting any media play. Did these glide under the radar screen? And did they ever catch the perpetrators?

The latest MARTA shenanigan posted by Charles Hobbs on our member board is the General Manager reporting to the agency Board: "Transmark vehicle was damaged when operator fueled with gasoline instead of diesel. Repairs are underway and disciplinary action of driver pending." P.S. -the board wants the General Manager who is quitting to stick around 3 more months while they search for a replacement.

I was fascinated in the May issue of Eye on Infrastructure to read Richard Little, Director of the Keston Institute for Infrastructure at the University of Southern California, in an interview state "A lot of what we need to do in the future is managing expectations as well as resources. People can’t expect that everything is going to be free - that is not realistic. There are many people in California and most are concentrated in our urban areas. This makes finding solutions difficult but if everyone is willing to give up a little then collectively we can all gain a lot. We can’t have a zero sum game where when I get something you lose." Amen!

How jaded have I become? Recently I sat in a room full of big shots and discovered I was the only one to ask the guest speaker, a member of our Congressional delegation, a meaningful transportation related question. Is it any wonder my ennui extends to having little interest in the impending release of the "updated" MTA Long Range Plan? This is my third or fourth Plan cycle (depending how you count the stillborn Plan of the late 1990s) and I have come to see them as compilations of previous Board actions done merely to fulfill legal mandates. So much of transportation policy consists of meaningless dog & pony shows whose chief purpose is to provide the ribbon cutting/ photo ops politicians (and even some bureaucrats) crave. Which is probably why I so enjoy my participation in the monthly meetings of the Plans and Programs Technical Advisory Committee of the Southern California Association of Governments. Yes, the presentations can often be deadly boring. Yet it is nice to sit amidst folks similarly steeped in transportation policy. And it is nice to be among true adults once in a while. So we take the good where we can find it and endure the rest.

I guess the fun is over--the San Gabriel Valley Transportation Authority website no longer works. Which isn't surprising as the L.A. Times recently reported that agency founder Yosuf Maiwandi had been arrested on suspicion of perjury for allegedly signing a document in which he misrepresented his position. A search of his home and auto shop turned up firearms, transit authority police badges and a white, unmarked Ford Crown Victoria complete with radio equipment, computer mobile digital terminal, official government license plate, flashing front and rear lights and siren. Is this the last chapter of this strange saga? Time will tell...

On May 17, 2006, Subcommittee #5 of the Assembly Budget Committee rejected the Governor's proposal to permanently shift Public Transportation Account (PTA) spillover revenues to reduce General Fund debt costs. I think this bespeaks transportation interests in the past year or so becoming organized and sending a clear signal to our friends in Sacramento that robbing trust funds to balance the state budget whenever the economy has a blip is no longer a viable option.

I'll conclude by noting how odd it is the city of L.A. is now helping reactive the Southern California Regional Airport Authority, since it was lack of involvement by L.A. a few years ago that led to the Authority going dormant. Oh, well--I guess that was then, and this is now…


[Transit Advocate] [SO.CA.TA Home Page]